Hysterical Liberal Intolerance
The left’s outrageously dishonest attempt to blame others for the Democrat policy disaster known as “ISIS” is such a brazen, in-your-face attack on the facts that it simply cannot go unanswered. Here are the top ten signs that this lunatic cult of Islamic savages currently raping, torturing, and mass-murdering its way across Syria and Iraq was created directly by Democrat policies:
10) Even anti-Iraq war partisans like NBC’s Richard Engel have openly laughed at the White House’s embarrassingly inept and delusional handling of ISIS from the beginning (like incompetently arming them by accident).
8) Even Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) disputed Obama’s naive and costly dismissal of ISIS as a “JV team” early on, and called his total non-response to the crisis “too cautious,” as it has allowed the group’s heinous atrocities to sweep across Syria and Iraq with impunity.
7) Even Palestinian terror-apologist Jimmy Carter blasted Obama for enabling ISIS to take over, saying, “We waited too long. We let the Islamic State build up its money, capability and strength, and weapons while it was still in Syria.”
6) Obama now openly lies about it even being his decision to leave Iraq…after campaigning for roughly a year straight on withdrawing the troops. He has also scrambled to blame the rise of ISIS on everything from George Bush (like the race card, it apparently never gets old), to his own subordinates…everything other than Obama carelessly hurrying us out of Iraq. Leftist professors and media outlets have even tried to blame “global warming.” And the State Department literally even tried to blame Muslim unemployment.
5) As with Obama’s disastrous appeasement of Russia, the “tragic” events Mitt Romney (and President Bush) predicted would happen did in fact end up happening exactly the way he said they would, despite Obama snidely mocking, ridiculing, and condescending to him the entire time on both Russia and Iraq.
4) Even Hillary Clinton is on the record directly attributing the rise of ISIS to Democrats refusing to aid the moderate rebels in Syria, which “left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled.”
3) Even Obama’s former CIA Director and Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, identified the reckless abandonment of Iraq as the reason ISIS then emerged. According to Panetta, this senseless Democrat betrayal of yet another vital U.S. ally “created a vacuum in terms of the ability of that country to better protect itself, and it’s out of that vacuum that ISIS began to breed.”
2) All the experts warned Obama that precisely this kind of violence and chaos would ensue across Iraq if he hastily rushed the withdrawal of our troops to meet his arbitrary December 2011 deadline (putting his partisan election-year concerns before our allies, interests, and national defense). Some experts, like Retired Army Gen. John M. Keane, even warned that Obama’s plan would be an “absolute disaster” from the moment it was announced.
1) ISIS (formerly al Qaida in Iraq) was already defeated by President Bush’s “Surge” strategy (which Democrats trashed, undermined, and insisted would never work), before Obama rushed in and prematurely withdrew nearly all of our troops, needlessly abandoning the country to bloodthirsty Islamic radicals.
Obama himself even fully acknowledged before surrendering the region to infidel-slaughtering psychopaths that there were “risks of increased bloodshed in Iraq without a continuing US presence there.” But he then still went on to ludicrously insist that “those risks are even greater if we continue to occupy Iraq and serve as a magnet for…terrorist activity”–a charge that missed the entire point of taking the fight to the enemy and that has been proven thoroughly and utterly wrong at this point.
As with Obama’s embarrassing insistence that “The Surge” would never work, his rejection of the interrogation methods that located Osama bin Laden (which he then outrageously took credit for), and his bogus “red line in the sand”…virtually every single thing this Nobel Peace Prize winner has said or done about terrorism in the Middle East has turned out to be disastrously wrong. Not that any of this matters when most of the news media refuse to even mention his abrupt pullout from Iraq when discussing the resulting carnage (compare this with every attack under Bush being framed as happening ‘this many days since the”Mission Accomplished” speech’).
Obama protects the Muslim fundamentalists who stone women to death for being raped, start global riots over cartoons, and who danced in the streets on 9/11, by equating them to Christians during the Crusades, diverting our attention to the “real threat” of right-wing domestic threats (anyone to the right of Karl Marx), and by refusing to even say the words, “Islamic extremists.” He openly arms, funds, and releases Islamic terrorists at every turn, and pretends that this left-wing “grovel, appease, and surrender” foreign policy approach isn’t even worse than Bill Clinton’s eight-year non-response to al Qaida (which made 9/11 possible).
The Bottom Line: As National Review masterfully spells out in excruciating, step-by-step detail, the facts overwhelmingly demonstrate that ISIS is the direct product of Democrat policies, and nothing else. The left’s absurd attempt to blame their relentlessly incompetent foreign policy failures on President Bush for daring to fight back against Islamic terror-sponsors years earlier is the equivalent of blaming FDR for the outcome of Vietnam. It is ridiculous on its face.
Both the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton have separately taken millions of dollars from a group that promotes Sharia Law. People give money to politicians to purchase influence, so what are these people (who support stoning women to death for being raped, humiliating, enslaving and slaughtering non-believers, executing adulterers and homosexuals, etc.) expecting in return for all of this money?
Sharia-pushing Islamist shares a stage with illegal immigrants who broke into our country at the treason convention. Shakes OUR Constitution in OUR faces while pretending that it says the complete opposite of what it says.
Newsflash: Constitutional rights don’t apply to foreigners. And the Constitution in no way obligates us to be the only country on Earth that doesn’t get to determine its own immigration laws or to acknowledge when it is under non-stop attack by bloodthirsty Islamic lunatics.
This embarrassingly ignorant lecturing from emotional liberal hysterics is naturally accompanied by the human shield tactic (hiding your absurd fallacies behind a sympathetic victim who cannot be questioned or criticized) because liberal arguments cannot compete on a level playing field against actual facts, evidence and thinking adults.
Hillary Clinton is insisting that she didn’t lie when she falsely told Benghazi families that the attack was the result of Americans having the right to disagree with Islam in public…while she simultaneously told those in her private circle that it was planned terrorist attack.
The record is unmistakable. She blatantly and deliberately lied. And now she is lying about having lied. Welcome to dealing with the Clintons.
Someone had to say it. Of course it would be Donald Trump. The left’s hysterical, speech-trampling witch-hunt against “racism” has consequences. The terrorists were seen gearing up but nobody would say anything. See also the 100% preventable Fort Hood massacre, the Boston Marathon bombing (committed by ‘refugees’ who were thoroughly ‘vetted’), the first WTC attack, etc.
It has now surfaced that one of the Islamic terrorists who recently mass-murdered Americans in San Bernardino, Tashfeen Malik, was “vetted” before being allowed to come to this country. She came to the U.S. on a visa issued by the same painstakingly vigilant federal agencies now insisting that Syrian “refugees” (terrorists) being imported by the thousands will also be properly “vetted.”
As Ben Carson recently put it, this “should end the conversation” about refugees.
This would be the same administration that is currently going out of its way to reward and legitimize as many illegal immigrants as possible for spitting on our laws and breaking into our country by the millions, in open defiance of its sworn duties under the Constitution…not to mention the rights and interests of the American people. It is the same administration that gave Iran everything it wanted as it pretended to stop going nuclear, created ISIS by ignoring all the experts and prematurely pulling everything out of Iraq, and told us ISIS was “contained” just before its latest international killing spree.
This administration officially has zero credibility on national defense at this point.
Notice how suddenly hysterical and unhinged the NY Daily News has become against the NRA? It is always biased, but not usually so openly poisonous and vitriolic.
What changed? They don’t respond this way to other massacres.
After Paris and now the worst Islamic attack on the U.S. since 9/11, they are concerned about voter attitudes toward Islam and Obama’s policies. So it’s suddenly raining psychotic venom against the NRA.
Example, notice how this rabid, ultra-partisan hit piece (above) trashes people as “cowards” for praying for the victims without further shredding the Constitution to disarm (illegally enslave) law-abiding Americans…with the same failed leftist policies that did NOTHING to stop the San Bernardino and Paris attacks?
It’s a distraction. If everyone is too busy eviscerating each other over the left’s outrageous attacks on gun rights to notice what an abject failure liberal policies are proving to be (and what heinous butchery continues at the hands of the ‘religion of peace’), it’s a win for liberals.
In the middle of the greatest Christian genocide since the days of the Apostles, liberals want us to know that importing thousands of fraudulent Syrian “refugees” (terrorists) while endlessly denying asylum to actual Christian victims is about “compassion.” They have even gone as far as to liken the Sharia-pushing Islamic fundamentalists they are putting in our back yards to Jews trying to escape the Holocaust and being turned away during WWII.
Of course, this backward Orwellian alternate reality they are creating blatantly ignores the fact that the only logical equivalent of WWII Jews in this situation is the Christians liberals refuse to help…while the Syrians they are demanding we accept are more like the Nazis.
Even partisan leftist propaganda mills are being forced to admit that this is completely delusional insanity. Meanwhile, our “post-partisan” president viciously smears those who object as being “scared of widows and orphans,” as even the UN confirms that the vast majority of these “refugees” are military-age males.
The Washington Times notes that 96 percent of the “refugees” Obama is accepting are Muslims, while only three percent are Christians. This openly biased display of bigotry against Christians (as well as all things white, male, and American) is far from isolated, and is in fact one of the defining features of modern liberalism.